The Rams had a disappointing 2009-2010 season going 1-15 behind a struggling Bulger. This brings me to ponder why the Rams don’t just get rid of Bulger and go for a guy like Michael Vick. Vick will probably either enter free agency or be traded. The Rams could offer Bulger and a draft pick or two to Philly for Vick.

Vick can be the player the Rams need. Steven Jackson was able to run well with a bad quarterback, and now with a chance of having a better play-making quarterback, this Rams team can win many more games this season.

If the Rams do get Vick out of free agency or in a trade, they can tidy up their defense as well with drafting star defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh.

As a side note, the team’s GM Bill Devaney has had a strong relationship with Vick dating back to their days in Atlanta with the Falcons.

The Rams could also make some more improvements. With Terrell Owens entering free agency, the Rams could offer him a contract. In the top ten with the most cap room space, St. Louis can easily get a top-tier player when free agency hits.

If you are thinking Vick will stay with Philly and stay as a backup, that is apparently not going to happen according to Matt Mosley of ESPN:

“I’ve never for one minute thought the Eagles were going to bring Vick back in 2010 — and that thought hasn’t changed. Vick was apparently the consummate teammate in his return to the league. But we’re talking about a former superstar who appears to have some tread left on his tires. Do you think he’s going to embrace being a backup in 2010 as well as he did in ‘09? Yeah, I don’t either.”

The Rams might as well go for Vick. They need to fix their roster. Getting rid of Bulger and going for Vick would be a good head start to a good offseason.